A Response To TIME Magazine’s Breastfeeding Cover

TIME Magazine Breastfeeding Cover

(TIME Magazine / May 21, 2012)

Blog post co-written by Dr. Steven Abrams, Neonatologist.

The TIME magazine cover story that hit the newsstands last week shows an older child (over 3 years) breastfeeding while standing on a chair while both he and his mother look into the camera. This is the visual that TIME chose to depict the 20th anniversary of “attachment parenting”, a phrase coined by Dr. Bill and Martha Sears.

Where to begin to consider this picture?

First, I am struck at how unnatural the pose looks. No matter whether a woman is breastfeeding her newborn infant or a toddler, they are usually holding the child in their arms. Breastfeeding is not like a cafeteria where you wait in line for your turn and step up to get your meal! It is a profound interaction between mother and infant that results in a cascade of sensory, hormonal and emotional responses in both mom and baby. The hormones that are released in the mother (and the baby) serve to strengthen that attachment… which is a good thing! In this picture, this relationship is not apparent. It is setup to emphasize the older age of the child and the messaging not about breastfeeding, but about one particular parenting style.

Secondly, focusing the national discussion on whether a 3 year old should stand up to breastfeed misses the much more important point about breastfeeding in the United States. That is, the tragedy that in the U.S. despite the efforts of many organizations (e.g. American Academy of Pediatrics, La Leche League, Women’s Infants and Children to name a few) and maternal-infant health care staff, the rates of breastfeeding until 3 months of age, much less 3 years of age, is pretty dismal compared to many other countries. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends weaning when both child and mother are ready. This is reasonable and not generally controversial, except when described as the TIME photo did.

The real challenge for our society is providing the support mothers need to get through those first few months so that they can achieve their goal of exclusive breastfeeding during the first 6 months and up to a year and beyond.

Finally, it is sad that TIME missed an opportunity to tout the benefits of mothers becoming attached to their babies — what a novel idea! Certainly breastfeeding can strengthen this attachment, especially when mothers have the support of their loved ones and others. But in the absence of breastfeeding beyond a certain defined age, any behavior that will strengthen the relationship between mother and child will be of benefit to families and our culture as a whole.

About Nancy Hurst, Director of Women's Support Services

I am an international board certified lactation consultant and the Director of Women's Support Services at Texas Children’s Hospital.

I’m the proud mother of 4 adult children (all previously breastfed!) and grandson. I am passionate about providing the best possible support and resources to families who are breastfeeding their infants.

Posted in Breastfeeding, Motherhood, Parenting

5 Responses to A Response To TIME Magazine’s Breastfeeding Cover

  1. Diane Murrell, Clinical Social Worker Diane Murrell, Clinical Social Worker says:

    Thank you for restoring dignity to mothers in regard to breastfeeding. Thank you for rising above the sensationalism and making it about the facts and the truth.

  2. Gerkin says:

    I agree the whole picture looks wrong, mothers are normal cradling their baby. You feed a child until they can feed themselves….this is why is doesnt look natural!

  3. Mochni-Talking Bird says:

    The follow-up issue (May 28, 2012) constitutes a smarmy rebuff to critics, showing other mothers and their nursing children considered for the cover in “out takes.” No response as thoughtful and in such length as your blog was published. I am quite offended that the child on the cover is wearing combat fatigues: a perfect propaganda image for those who do not wish us well, particularly in hostile territories. Thank you for the entry. I would hope it could be published more widely, e.g., the entire chain of Hearst Newspapers, not only in the Houston Chronicle.

  4. Kate Yadan says:

    That people are freaking out about all over this country over thsi cover is an embarrassment. Attachment parenting and choosing to breast feed is each family’s choice and should be encouraged not sensationalized. Shame on Time Magazine!

  5. Sarah Parker says:

    Does not depict a picture of bonding or what mother hood should be! More like an odd advertisement. With many things commercialised, seems breast feeding is no exception. Thank You for your valuable comments.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. The * fields are required. Links are not allowed.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>